It include five situations: positive proper care opinions (“Alarming assists us to end dilemmas later on”), thinking Hartford CT backpage escort on uncontrollability and hazard (“My personal worrying is risky personally”), cognitive ability (“We have nothing depend on in my thoughts to have words and you may labels”), general negative thinking (“Easily failed to manage a stressing imagine, after which it happened, it will be my personal fault”), and you will cognitive thinking-awareness (“In my opinion a great deal in the my advice”). The metacognition questionnaire are scored within the a beneficial 4 part measure away from 1 (“don’t concur”) so you’re able to cuatro (“agree really”) together with a good Chronbach’s leader = .88. The latest metacognition questionnaire has been utilized commonly from inside the low-clinical products including smokers and you will college students [44, 45]. An entire get was calculated to make an inventory off metacognition for every single participant.
Brand new Obsessive-Obsessive Collection try a 42-product notice-declaration questionnaire, assessing the severity of various obsessions and you will compulsions regarding OCD in the adults . The fresh new compulsive-obsessive list includes seven subscales that include laundry (“I clean my personal hand with greater regularity otherwise more than requisite”), examining (“I go to locations to ensure that I have maybe not injured somebody”), doubting (“Regardless of if I do some thing very carefully Personally i think that it is not slightly correct”), ordering (“I have disturb in the event that anyone else have changed how i features set-up my one thing”), obsessing (“I’ve found challenging to deal with my opinion”), hoarding (“I assemble something I do not you desire”), and you may neutralising (“I feel I need to recite particular number”). It index try scored into the a great cuatro area Likert size, from (“definitely not”) so you can cuatro (“extremely”) and had good Chronbach’s alpha = .88. A complete score is determined to form one score for every single participant regarding O-C episodes.
Procedure
A chance attempt off university students participated in the study. Members have been first of all presented with information about the research and you can given the ability to make inquiries about it. Just after offering agree, for each participant given demographic advice, immediately after which had been given this new four surveys in the a great counterbalanced purchase to answer from the her day. If the new member accomplished she or he was thanked and debriefed. All the materials and functions then followed brand new moral advice and functions outlined by the Western Psychological Association and you may was indeed seemed and you can accepted of the College or university of Hertfordshire integrity committee (Number:14149216).
Performance
Data try screened getting forgotten viewpoints, outliers and you may presumptions off statistical data just before one research . All parameters had acceptable philosophy to have skewness and you may kurtosis no significant outliers. Bivariate correlations of your countless every calculated indexes shown positive and you may extreme contacts among them (Table step one). The strongest connection was involving the indexes of county and trait anxiety, followed closely by brand new connection between nervousness susceptibility, metacognition and you may O-C episodes.
Our first prediction was that metacognition and anxiety (state and trait) would be significant predictors of O-C symptoms. Consistent with our expectations all variables were associated to O-C symptoms in significant and positive correlations (all ps < .001) [24, 30, 33].
In order to investigate the relative importance of each of the computed index on the prediction of O-C symptoms all the indexes were used as simultaneous predictors of O-C symptoms in a multivariate regression analysis. Results revealed that metacognition was the best predictor of O-C symptoms (? = .41, p < .001), followed by trait anxiety (? = .21, p < .05), state anxiety (? = .16, p = .08), and anxiety sensitivity (? = .04, p = .63). The overall model resulted significant, R 2 = .49, F(4, 151) = , p < .001). Although previous research indicated that anxiety sensitivity is a good predictor of O-C symptoms , the inclusion of the other variables reduced its effect to a non-significant level.